You have learnt about the basic principles of reflection and refraction. In this chapter, you will learn about phenomena that arise with waves in two and three dimensions: interference and diffraction.
You have learnt about the basic principles of reflection and refraction. In this chapter, you will learn about phenomena that arise with waves in two and three dimensions: interference and diffraction.
The diagram shows three identical waves being emitted by three point sources. All points marked with the same letter are in phase. Join all points with the same letter.
![]() |
What type of lines (straight, curved, etc) do you get? How does this compare to the line that joins the sources?
Consider three point sources of waves. If each source emits waves isotropically (i.e. the same in all directions) we will get the situation shown in as shown in Figure 2.
![]() |
We define a wavefront as the imaginary line that joins waves that are in phase. These are indicated by the grey, vertical lines in Figure 2. The points that are in phase can be peaks, troughs or anything in between, it doesn't matter which points you choose as long as they are in phase.
Christiaan Huygens described how to determine the path of waves through a medium.
Each point on a wavefront acts like a point source of circular waves. The waves emitted from these point sources interfere to form another wavefront.
A simple example of the Huygens Principle is to consider the single wavefront in Figure 3.
![]() |
Given the wavefront,
![]() |
use the Huygens Principle to determine the wavefront at a later time.
![]() |
![]() |
Huygens generally receives minor credit for his role in the development of modern calculus. He also achieved note for his arguments that light consisted of waves; see: wave-particle duality in Chapter (Reference). In 1655, he discovered Saturn's moon Titan. He also examined Saturn's planetary rings, and in 1656 he discovered that those rings consisted of rocks. In the same year he observed and sketched the Orion Nebula. He also discovered several interstellar nebulae and some double stars.
Interference occurs when two identical waves pass through the same region of space at the same time resulting in a superposition of waves. There are two types of interference which is of interest: constructive interference and destructive interference.
Constructive interference occurs when both waves have a displacement in the same direction, while destructive interference occurs when one wave has a displacement in the opposite direction to the other, thereby resulting in a cancellation. When two waves interfere destructively, the resultant absolute displacement of the medium is less than in either of the individual displacements. When total destructive interference occurs, there is no displacement of the medium. For constructive interference the displacement of the medium is greater than the individual displacements.
Constructive interference is the result of two waves with similar phase overlapping. This means that positive parts of one wave tend to overlap with positive parts of the other, and alike for the negative parts. When positive is added to positive and negative is added to negative, the net absolute displacement of the medium is greater than the displacements of the individual waves.
Destructive interference, on the other hand, is the result of two waves with non-similar phase (i.e. anti-phase) overlapping. This means that the positive parts of one wave tend to align with the negative parts of the second wave. When the waves are added together, the positive and negative contributions lead to a net absolute displacement of the medium which is less than the absolute displacements of either of the individual waves. A place where destructive interference takes place is called a node.
Waves can interfere at places where there is never a trough and trough or peak and peak or trough and peak at the same time. At these places the waves will add together and the resultant displacement will be the sum of the two waves but they won't be points of maximum interference.
Consider the two identical waves shown in the picture below. The wavefronts of the peaks are shown as black lines while the wavefronts of the troughs are shown as grey lines. You can see that the black lines cross other black lines in many places. This means two peaks are in the same place at the same time so we will have constructive interference where the two peaks add together to form a bigger peak.
![]() |
Two points sources (A and B) radiate identical waves. The wavefronts of the peaks (black lines) and troughs (grey lines) are shown. Constructive interference occurs where two black lines intersect or where two gray lines intersect. Destructive interference occurs where a black line intersects with a grey line.
When the grey lines cross other grey lines there are two troughs in the same place at the same time so we will have constructive interference where the two troughs add together to form a bigger trough.
In the case where a grey line crosses a black line we are seeing a trough and peak at the same time. These will cancel each other out and the medium will have no displacement at that point.
On half the picture below, we have marked the constructive interference with a solid black diamond and the destructive interference with a hollow diamond.
![]() |
To see if you understand it, cover up the half we have marked with diamonds and try to work out which points are constructive and destructive on the other half of the picture. The two halves are mirror images of each other so you can check yourself.
One of the most interesting, and also very useful, properties of waves is diffraction.
Diffraction is the ability of a wave to spread out in wavefronts as the wave passes through a small aperture or around a sharp edge.
Diffraction refers to various phenomena associated with wave propagation, such as the bending, spreading and interference of waves emerging from an aperture. It occurs with any type of wave, including sound waves, water waves, electromagnetic waves such as light and radio waves. While diffraction always occurs, its effects are generally only noticeable for waves where the wavelength is on the order of the feature size of the diffracting objects or apertures.
For example, if two rooms are connected by an open doorway and a sound is produced in a remote corner of one of them, a person in the other room will hear the sound as if it originated at the doorway.
![]() |
As far as the second room is concerned, the vibrating air in the doorway is the source of the sound. The same is true of light passing the edge of an obstacle, but this is not as easily observed because of the short wavelength of visible light.
This means that when waves move through small holes they appear to bend around the sides because there are not enough points on the wavefront to form another straight wavefront. This is bending round the sides we call diffraction.
Diffraction effects are more clear for water waves with longer wavelengths. Diffraction can be demonstrated by placing small barriers and obstacles in a ripple tank and observing the path of the water waves as they encounter the obstacles. The waves are seen to pass around the barrier into the regions behind it; subsequently the water behind the barrier is disturbed. The amount of diffraction (the sharpness of the bending) increases with increasing wavelength and decreases with decreasing wavelength. In fact, when the wavelength of the waves are smaller than the obstacle, no noticeable diffraction occurs.
Water waves in a ripple tank can be used to demonstrate diffraction and interference.
When a wave strikes a barrier with a hole only part of the wave can move through the hole. If the hole is similar in size to the wavelength of the wave then diffraction occurs. The waves that come through the hole no longer looks like a straight wave front. It bends around the edges of the hole. If the hole is small enough it acts like a point source of circular waves.
Now if we allow the wavefront to impinge on a barrier with a hole in it, then only the points on the wavefront that move into the hole can continue emitting forward moving waves - but because a lot of the wavefront has been removed, the points on the edges of the hole emit waves that bend round the edges.
![]() |
If you employ Huygens' principle you can see the effect is that the wavefronts are no longer straight lines.
![]() |
Each point of the slit acts like a point source. If we think about the two point sources on the edges of the slit and call them A and B then we can go back to the diagram we had earlier but with some parts blocked by the wall.
![]() |
If this diagram were showing sound waves then the sound would be louder (constructive interference) in some places and quieter (destructive interference) in others. You can start to see that there will be a pattern (interference pattern) to the louder and quieter places. If we were studying light waves then the light would be brighter in some places than others depending on the interference.
The intensity (how bright or loud) of the interference pattern for a single narrow slit looks like this:
![]() |
The picture above shows how the waves add together to form the interference pattern. The peaks correspond to places where the waves are adding most intensely and the minima are places where destructive interference is taking place. When looking at interference patterns from light the spectrum looks like:
![]() |
There is a formula we can use to determine where the peaks and minima are in the interference spectrum. There will be more than one minimum. There are the same number of minima on either side of the central peak and the distances from the first one on each side are the same to the peak. The distances to the peak from the second minimum on each side is also the same, in fact the two sides are mirror images of each other. We label the first minimum that corresponds to a positive angle from the centre as
![]() |
The equation for the angle at which the minima occur is given in the definition below:
The angle at which the minima in the interference spectrum occur is:
where
A slit with a width of 2511 nm has red light of wavelength 650 nm impinge on it. The diffracted light interferes on a surface. At which angle will the first minimum be?
We know that we are dealing with interference patterns from the diffraction of light passing through a slit. The slit has a width of 2511 nm which is
We know that there is a relationship between the slit width, wavelength and interference minimum angles:
We can use this relationship to find the angle to the minimum by substituting what we know and solving for the angle.
The first minimum is at 15 degrees from the centre peak.
A slit with a width of 2511 nm has green light of wavelength 532 nm impinge on it. The diffracted light interferers on a surface, at what angle will the first minimum be?
We know that we are dealing with interference patterns from the diffraction of light passing through a slit. The slit has a width of 2511 nm which is
We know that there is a relationship between the slit width, wavelength and interference minimum angles:
We can use this relationship to find the angle to the minimum by substituting what we know and solving for the angle.
The first minimum is at 12.2 degrees from the centre peak.
From the formula
A slit has a width which is unknown and has green light of wavelength 532 nm impinge on it. The diffracted light interferers on a surface, and the first minimum is measure at an angle of 20.77 degrees?
We know that we are dealing with interference patterns from the diffraction of light passing through a slit. We know that the wavelength of the light is 532 nm which is
We know that there is a relationship between the slit width, wavelength and interference minimum angles:
We can use this relationship to find the width by substituting what we know and solving for the width.
The slit width is 1500 nm.
![]() |
Now we know that the waves move away from the source at the speed of sound. What happens if the source moves at the same time as emitting sounds? Once a sound wave has been emitted it is no longer connected to the source so if the source moves it doesn't change the way the sound wave is propagating through the medium. This means a source can actually catch up to the sound waves it has emitted.
The speed of sound is very fast in air, about
| Aircraft | speed at altitude ( |
speed at altitude ( |
| Concorde | 2 330 | 647 |
| Gripen | 2 410 | 669 |
| Mirage F1 | 2 573 | 715 |
| Mig 27 | 1 885 | 524 |
| F 15 | 2 660 | 739 |
| F 16 | 2 414 | 671 |
Subsonic refers to speeds slower than the speed of sound.
When a source emits sound waves and is moving slower than the speed of sound you get the situation in this picture. Notice that the source moving means that the wavefronts, and therefore peaks in the wave, are actually closer together in the one direction and further apart in the other.
![]() |
If you measure the waves on the side where the peaks are closer together you'll measure a different wavelength than on the other side of the source. This means that the noise from the source will sound different on the different sides. This is called the Doppler Effect.
when the wavelength and frequency measured by an observer are different to those emitted by the source due to movement of the source or observer.
Supersonic refers to speeds faster than the speed of sound.
If a plane flies at exactly the speed of sound then the waves that it emits in the direction it is flying won't be able to get away from the plane. It also means that the next sound wave emitted will be exactly on top of the previous one, look at this picture to see what the wavefronts would look like:
![]() |
Sometimes we use the speed of sound as a reference to describe the speed of the object (aircraft in our discussion).
The Mach Number is the ratio of the speed of an object to the speed of sound in the surrounding medium.
Mach number is tells you how many times faster than sound the aircraft is moving.
To work out the Mach Number divide the speed of the aircraft by the speed of sound.
Remember: the units must be the same before you divide.
If the aircraft is moving faster than the speed of sound then the wavefronts look like this:
![]() |
If the source moves faster than the speed of sound, a cone of wave fronts is created. This is called a Mach cone. From constructive interference, we know that two peaks that add together form a larger peak. In a Mach cone many, many peaks add together to form a very large peak. This is a sound wave so the large peak is a very, very loud sound wave. This sounds like a huge "boom" and we call the noise a sonic boom.
A sonic boom is the sound heard by an observer as a shockwave passes.
An aircraft flies at 1300
We know we are dealing with Mach Number. We are given the speed of sound in air,
We know that there is a relationship between the Mach Number, the speed of sound and the speed of the aircraft:
We can use this relationship to find the Mach Number.
The Mach Number is 1.06.
In this exercise we will determine the Mach Number for the different aircraft in the previous table. To help you get started we have calculated the Mach Number for the Concord with a speed of sound
For the Condorde we know the speed and we know that:
For the Concorde this means that
| Aircraft | speed at altitude ( |
speed at altitude ( |
Mach Number |
| Concorde | 2 330 | 647 | 1.9 |
| Gripen | 2 410 | 669 | |
| Mirage F1 | 2 573 | 715 | |
| Mig 27 | 1 885 | 524 | |
| F 15 | 2 660 | 739 | |
| F 16 | 2 414 | 671 |
Now calculate the Mach Numbers for the other aircraft in the table.
The shape of the Mach Cone depends on the speed of the aircraft. When the Mach Number is 1 there is no cone but as the aircraft goes faster and faster the angle of the cone gets smaller and smaller.
If we go back to the supersonic picture we can work out what the angle of the cone must be.
![]() |
We build a triangle between how far the plane has moved and how far a wavefront at right angles to the direction the plane is flying has moved:
An aircraft emits a sound wavefront. The wavefront moves at the speed of sound 340
![]() |
We know how fast the wavefront and the aircraft are moving so we know the distances that they have traveled:
![]() |
The angle between the cone that forms and the direction of the plane can be found from the right-angle triangle we have drawn into the figure. We know that
In this case we have used sound and aircraft but a more general way of saying this is:
We often just write the equation as:
From this equation, we can see that the faster the source (aircraft) moves, the smaller the angle of the Mach cone.
In this exercise we will determine the Mach Cone Angle for the different aircraft in the table mentioned above. To help you get started we have calculated the Mach Cone Angle for the Concorde with a speed of sound
For the Condorde we know the speed and we know that:
For the Concorde this means that
| Aircraft | speed at altitude ( |
speed at altitude ( |
Mach Cone Angle (degrees) |
| Concorde | 2 330 | 647 | 31.7 |
| Gripen | 2 410 | 669 | |
| Mirage F1 | 2 573 | 715 | |
| Mig 27 | 1 885 | 524 | |
| F 15 | 2 660 | 739 | |
| F 16 | 2 414 | 671 |
Now calculate the Mach Cone Angles for the other aircraft in the table.
![]() |