The conformation of a molecule arises from the rotation of a single bond (Figure 22). However, even though there is rotation about the bond, there are energy barriers due to steric interactions of the substituents. In order to understand (and predict) these interactions, it is necessary to visualize the molecule in such a manner as to highlight the across-bond interactions; this is done by using a Newman projection.
A Newman projection, useful in alkane stereochemistry, visualizes chemical conformations of a carbon-carbon chemical bond from front to back, with the front carbon represented by a dot and the back carbon as a circle (Figure 23). The front carbon atom is called proximal, while the back atom is called distal. This type of representation is useful for assessing the torsional angle between bonds. Using ethane as an example, the Newman projection along the C-C single bond results in two basic conformations: eclipsed (Figure 23a) and staggered (Figure 23b). The staggered conformation will be energetically favored since the substituents are the most distant from each other. Conversely, the staggered will be the highest in energy. The difference in energy between the two conformations will define the barrier to rotation. In the case of ethane this is very small (12.5 kJ/mol).
Although we often only consider the two extreme conformations, in reality there is a continuum around 360° rotation of the C-C bond. Figure 24 shows the relative energy as a function of the dihedral angle for ethane. Since each carbon in ethane has equivalent substitution (i.e., three H atoms) the energy for each staggered conformation is the same. This is not true for more complex molecules such as butane (Figure 25).
As may be seen from Figure 25, the staggered conformation in which the two methyl groups (represented by the black circles) are as far away from each other (anti) is the most energetically favored. The other two staggered conformations (gauche) are mirror images of each other and are hence conformation enantiomers. It should also be noted from Figure 25 that the eclipsed conformations vary in energy since the presence of methyl...methyl near neighbors is clearly less energetically favorable than methyl...H near neighbors.
Generally the rotation about C-C bonds has a low barrier to rotation, however, if substituents are sufficiently bulky the molecule will not twist around the bond, e.g., substituted bi-phenyl with sterically bulky substituents (Figure 26).
Free rotation about a C-C bond is not fully possible when you have a ring system, e.g., in a cyclic compound such as cyclohexane, C6H14. The limited rotation about the C-C bonds results in the flipping of the ring conformation from the chair form (Figure 27a) to the boat form (Figure 27b). Since the boat form has steric hindrance between the hydrogen atoms, the chair form is the more stable.
Lone pairs often behave in a different manner to substituents in regard to conformations. Thus, methylamine (CH3NH2) would be predicted to have the staggered conformation shown in Figure 28a. However, the lower steric bulk of the lone pair results in the nitrogen being 0.09 Å away from the true center of the CH3 projection (Figure 28b).
In compounds with more than one lone pair, the lowest energy form is not always the anti conformation. For example, at 20 °C hydrazine (H2NNH2) is 100% gauche (Figure 29a); but for substituted hydrazines (i.e., a diamine, R2NNR2) if the substituent groups are sufficiently large then the anti conformation will dominate (Figure 29b).
The conformation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is dominated by the lone pairs rather than the hydrogen atoms. Instead of the expected anti conformation (c.f., Figure 25 where the black circles would represent the hydrogen atoms) in the free state the dihedral angle is 94° (Figure 30). The conformation of hydrogen peroxide is therefore neither eclipsed nor staggered but an intermediate structure. When in the solid state hydrogen bonding will cause the shape and angles to change.