Skip to content Skip to navigation

OpenStax_CNX

You are here: Home » Content » Bibliography

Navigation

Lenses

What is a lens?

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

This content is ...

Affiliated with (What does "Affiliated with" mean?)

This content is either by members of the organizations listed or about topics related to the organizations listed. Click each link to see a list of all content affiliated with the organization.
  • Rice Digital Scholarship display tagshide tags

    This module is included in aLens by: Digital Scholarship at Rice UniversityAs a part of collection: "A History of Federal Science Policy from the New Deal to the Present"

    Click the "Rice Digital Scholarship" link to see all content affiliated with them.

    Click the tag icon tag icon to display tags associated with this content.

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

Tags

(What is a tag?)

These tags come from the endorsement, affiliation, and other lenses that include this content.
 

Bibliography

Module by: William Blanpied. E-mail the authorEdited By: Frederick Moody, Ben Allen

Abelson, Philip, and Lee DuBridge, Science 162, no. 3861 (1968): 1435.

Atkinson, Richard C., and William A. Blanpied. “Research Universities: Core of the US Science and Technology System.” Technology in Society 30 (2008): 30-48.

Auerswald, Philip, and Lewis Branscomb. “Start-Ups and Spin-offs: Collective Entrepreneurship Between Invention and Innovation.” David M. Hart, ed., The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Policy: Governance, Start-Ups, and Growth in the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Beckler, David Z. “The Precarious Life of Science in the White House.” Holton, Gerald, and William A. Blanpied, eds., Science and Its Public: The Changing Relationship. Boston: D. Reidel, 1976, 115-34.

Bell, Daniel. “Technology, Nature and Society: The Vicissitudes of Three World Views and the Confusion of Realms.” The American Scholar (Summer 1973): 400-401.

Berman, Larry. The Office of Management and Budget and the Presidency, 1921-1979. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.

Blanpied, William A., ed. Impacts of the Early Cold War on the Formulation of U.S. Science Policy: Selected Memoranda of William T. Golden, October 1950-April 1951. Washington, DC: AAAS, 1995.

___________. “Inventing U.S. Science Policy.” Physics Today (Feb. 1998): 34-40.

Branscomb, Lewis M. “A Federal Department of Science and Technology: The Case for and Against.” Technology in Society 8, nos. 1/2 (1986): 65‑75.

­­­­___________. “Helping the President Manage the Federal Science and Technology Enterprise.” Golden, William T., ed., Science Advice to the President. New York: Pergamon, 1980, 107-14.

___________. “Opportunities for Cooperation Between Government, Industry and the University.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 334 (Dec. 14, 1979): 221‑227.

___________. “Science in the White House—A New Start.” Science 196 (May 20, 1977): 848‑852.

___________. “Toward a U.S. Technology Policy.” Issues in Science and Technology 7, no. 4 (Summer 1991): 50-55.

___________., and James H. Keller, eds. Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation System That Works. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.

Bromley, D. Allan. The President’s Scientists: Reminiscences of a White House Science Advisor. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.

Brooks, Harvey. The Government of Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1968.

Bronx, Detlev W. “Science Advice in the White House: the Genesis of the President’s Science Advisers and the National Science Foundation.” Golden, William T., ed., Science Advice to the President. New York: Pergamon, 1980, 245-56.

Brundage, Percival. The Bureau of the Budget. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1970.

Bush, Vannevar. “As We May Think.” Atlantic Monthly (July 1945).

___________. Pieces of the Action. New York: Morrow, 1970.

___________. Science—the Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1945. Reprinted by the National Science Foundation, 1990.

Cole, Jonathan R. The Great American University. New York: Public Affairs, 2010.

Committee on International Relations, U.S. House of Representatives. Science, Technology, and American Diplomacy: An Extended Study of the Interactions of Science and Technology with United States Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.

Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007.

Council on Competitiveness. Innovate America!. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness, 2005.

Crowther, James G. Science in Modern Society. London: The Cresset Press. 1967.

David, Edward E., Jr. “Toward a National Science Policy.” American Scientist (January-February 1973): 20.

Cutler, Robert. No Time for Rest. Boston: Little Brown, 1966.

Dupree, A. Hunter. “Central Scientific Organizations in the United States Government.” Minerva 1, no. 4 (Summer 1963): 453-69.

___________. “Comment: The Role of Technology in Society and the Need for Historical Perspective.” Technology and Culture (October 1969): 528.

___________. Science in the Federal Government: A History of Policies and Activities to 1940. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University, 1957.

___________. “Science Policy in the United States: The Legacy of John Quincy Adams,” Minerva 28, no. 2 (September 1990).

___________, in Gerald Holton, ed. The Great Instauration of 1940: The Organization of Scientific Research for War. New York: Norton, 450.

England, J. Merton. A Patron for Pure Science: The National Science Foundation’s Formative Years. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, 1983.

Ford, Gerald R. “Science and Technology and Presidential Science and Technology Advice.” Golden, William T., ed. Science Advice to the President. New York: Pergamon, 1980, 77-78.

Fredrickson, D.S. The Recombinant DNA Controversy: A Memoir. Washington, DC: ASM Press, 2001.

Garwin, Richard L., Kurt Gottfried, and Henry Kendall. The Fallacy of Star Wars. New York: Vintage Books, 1984.

Gibbons, John H. This Gifted Age: Science and Technology at the Millennium. New York: Springer Verlag, 1997.

Golden, William T., ed. Science Advice to the President. New York: Pergamon, 1980.

___________, ed. Science Advice to the President, Congress, and Judiciary. New York: Pergamon Press, 1988.

___________, and J. Thomas Ratchford,guest editors. Technology in Society, Special Issue: Science, Engineering, and Technology in Government and Industry Around the World: Translating Knowledge into Power and Wealth 19, no. 3/4 (August/November 1997).

Greenberg, Daniel. The Politics of Pure Science. New York: New American Library. 1967.

Herken, Gregg. Cardinal Choices: Presidential Science Advising from the Atomic Bomb Through SDI. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.

Holton, Gerald, ed. The Great Instauration of 1940: The Organization of Scientific Research for War. New York: Norton, 1972.

___________, and William A. Blanpied, eds. Science and Its Publics: The Changing Relationship. Boston: D. Reidel, 1976.

Huddle, Franklin P. Evolution of International Technology. Prepared for the Subcommittee on National Security Policy and Scientific Development of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, U.S. House of Representatives, by the Science Policy and Foreign Affairs Divisions, Legislative Reference Service, Library of Congress, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1970.

Jasanoff, Sheila. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policy Makers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.

Karl, Barry D. Charles Merriam and the Study of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974.

___________. Executive Reorganization and Reform in the New Deal: The Genesis of Administrative Management, 1900-1939. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.

Katz, James E. Presidential Politics and Science Policy. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1978.

Kevles, Daniel J. “Scientists, the Military, and the Control of Postwar Defense Research: The Case of the Research Board for National Security, 1944-46.” Technology and Culture 16, no. 1 (Jan. 1975): 20-45.

___________. “The National Science Foundation and the Debate over Postwar Research Policy, 1942-45,” Isis 68, (1977): 5-26.

Killian, James R. Sputnik, Scientists, and Eisenhower: A Memoir of the First Special Assistant to the President for Science and Technology. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1982.

Kistiakowsky, George B., and Charles S. Meier. A Scientist at the White House: The Private Diary of President Eisenhower’s Assistant for Science and Technology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976.

Lane, Neal. Technology in Society. “U.S. Science and Technology: An Uncoordinated System that Seems To Work.” Blanpied, William A., Rodney W. Nichols, and J. Thomas Ratchford, (Guest Editors). Special Issue:China, India, and the United States, Technology in Society 30, nos. 3-4 (August-November 2008): 248-64.

National Academy of Sciences. Federal Support of Basic Research in Institutions of Higher Learning. Washington, DC: National Research Council, 1964.

National Academy of Sciences. The International Geophysical Year. www.nationalacademies.org/history/igy.

National Resources Committee. Research: a National Resource. Vol. 1, “Relation of the Federal Government to Research.” Washington, DC: US General Printing Office, November 1938.

National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators. Issued biennially, beginning in 1972.

Nelson, Richard R., and Nathan Rosenberg, eds. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Nichols, Rodney W. “Federal Science Policy and the Universities: Consequences of Success.” Cole, J., and Stephen Graubard, eds. Daedalus (Fall 1993): 197-224.

___________. “Honor the Goddess and the Cow.” Technology in Society 26, nos. 2/3 (2004): 101-122.

___________. “Mission-Oriented R&D.” Science 172 (April 2, 1971).

___________. “Pluralism in Science and Technology: Arguments for Organizing Federal Support for R&D Around Independent Missions.” Technology in Society 8 (1986): 33-63.

___________., et al., Science and Technology in International Affairs. New York: Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government, 1992.

Office of the Home Secretary; National Academy of Sciences. Lee DuBridge, Biographical Memoirs, v. 72. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1997.

Polenberg, Richard, ed. In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer: Security Clearance Hearings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002.

Price, Don K. The Scientific Estate. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1965.

Rabi, I.I. Science: The Center of Culture. New York: The World Publishing Company, 1970.

Ratchford, J. Thomas. “Put Science and Technology Back into Foreign Policy.” Science 282 (November 27, 1998): 1650.

___________. “Science, Technology, and U.S. Foreign Relations.” The Bridge 28 (Summer 1998): 17-23.

___________, and Umberto Colombo. “Megascience.” World Science Report 1996. Paris: UNESCO, 1996, 214-224.

Reingold, Nathan. “Vannevar Bush’s New Deal for Research: or, The Triumph of the Old Order.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 17 (1987): 299-344.

Skolnikoff, Eugene B., International Imperatives of Technology: Technology Development and the International Political System. Berkeley, CA: Institute for International Studies, 1972.

___________. Science, Technology and American Foreign Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1967.

___________. “Scientific Advice in the State Department.” Science (Nov. 25, 1966): 981.

___________. The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.

Smith, Bruce L.R. The Advisers. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1982.

Steelman, John R. Science and Public Policy. New York: Arno Press. 1980. (Reprinted from the original report issued on August 27, 1947.)

Stever, H. Guyford. In War and Peace: My Life in Science and Technology. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press, 2002.

Stewart, Irwin. Organizing Science for War. Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1948.

Stone, A. Harold, Don K. Price, and Kathryn H. Stone. City Manager Government in the United States: A Review After Twenty-five Years. Chicago: Public Administration Service, 1940.

Teich, Albert H. “Can Administrative Measures Resolve a Political Conflict?” Public Administration Review (January-February 2008): 19-22.

___________. “Impacts of Post-September 11 Security Policies on U.S. Science.” Andrew D. James, ed., Science and Technology Policies for the Anti-Terrorism Era. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2006.

___________. “Endless Frontier or Just a Mirage? The Quest for a National Science Policy.” Science Communication 20, no. 1 (September 1998): 124-135.

___________., and Wendy D. White. “The High Cost of Coming to America.” Science 312 (May 5, 2006): 657.

UNESCO World Science Reports: 2005 and 2010. Paris: UNESCO, 2005 and 2010.

U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Science and Astronautics, Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Development. Towards a Science Policy for the United States. Committee Report, 91st Congress, 2nd Session, October 1970.

U.S. Senate, Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation and the Committee on Human Resources. A Legislative History of the National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976. 95th Congress, 1st session. April 1977.

Wells, William Jr. “Science Advice and the Presidency: An Overview from Roosevelt to Ford.” Golden, William T., ed., Science Advice to the President. New York: Pergamon, 1980, 191-220.

Weinberg, Alvin M. “Criteria for Scientific Choice.” Minerva 1 (Summer 1963): 159-71.

___________. Reflections on Big Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1967.

Wiesner, Jerome B. Where Science and Politics Meet. New York: McGraw Hill, 1965.

___________. “The Rise and Fall of the President’s Science Advisory Committee.” Golden, William T., ed., Science Advice to the President, the Congress, and the Judiciary. New York: Pergamon Press, 1988, 372-384.

Wolfle, Dael. The Home of Science: The Role of the University. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.

York, Herbert, and G. Allen Greb. “Military Research and Development: A Postwar History.” The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 33 (January 1977): 12-25.

Zachary, Gregg Pascal. Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.

Content actions

Download module as:

PDF | EPUB (?)

What is an EPUB file?

EPUB is an electronic book format that can be read on a variety of mobile devices.

Downloading to a reading device

For detailed instructions on how to download this content's EPUB to your specific device, click the "(?)" link.

| More downloads ...

Add module to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need an account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens I own (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

| External bookmarks