The stage carrying Phil and her father stops at Ma Breen's, the end of the line, thirty miles from Fort Apache. Inside, they find a setting similar to that of Krimmel's Dance in a Country Tavern (Figure 1(a)). A bar stands in one corner, and opposite it, there is a crude table and a bench (Figure 1(b)).
|
Colonel Thursday asks if there is a rig for hire to take them on to the fort. “Nothing fit for the likes o'the lady”, Ma Breen replies, drawing attention to the contrast between her own plain dress and Phil's elegant travelling costume (Figure 2).
![]() |
The meeting of old and young, and rich and poor in scenes like this is often pointed to by art historians as evidence of the essentially democratic nature of genre painting. However it is interpreted, it is certainly another characteristic Ford’s scenes share with genre painting. Ma admires Phil's stylish hat. “Is it from St. Louis?,” she asks, as if that midwestern city were the center of fashion and taste. “It's from Boston”, Phil tells her. “Boston, Massachusetts?” Ma asks, with delight and awe equally mixed in her voice. Phil hands her the hat to try on while the stable hand watches from behind the bar (Figure 3). Ma takes the hat as if it embodied all that Boston signified -not only fashion, but probably friends and loved ones too - and puts it on as if it might magically transform this stagecoach stop into a lace-curtain parlor. The result is comic - she puts it on backwards (Figure 4) - but also touching, because it suggests just how remote this place is from all Phil's hat symbolizes.
![]() |
![]() |
This may seem like a lot of symbolism for Phil's hat to carry in addition to all its flowers and ribbons, but in genre painting such symbolism is not unusual and not always so easy to interpret. Thomas Hovenden's Bringing Home the Bride (Figure 5(a)) and Eastman Johnson's The New Bonnet (Figure 5(b)) are just two examples of hearth pictures in which a hat is the center of attention.
|
Hovenden's bride stands in the middle of a comfortable parlor wearing a decorated hat that increases her already considerable stature. She towers over everyone in the room: a young girl seated in the window, an old man who sits in a Windsor chair facing her, the elderly maid who takes her cloak, and in the background, the groom, presumably, who stoops so a young woman can whisper in his ear. The bride's hat is as much the object of everyone’s attention as the bride herself. It seems to be perched on her head is such away that the slightest disapproval will topple it.
The hat in Johnson's painting is also the object of scrutiny. One woman, rather finely dressed, holds the new bonnet aloft for a more plainly dressed woman to admire. The second woman seems to reserve her judgment by not turning toward the hat, but only looking over her shoulder at it. On the left side of the painting, a man sits before the hearth with his back to the women and the hat. His forearms rest on his knees and his hands are spread apart as if he is measuring some enigmatic dimension of the hat.
Compared with the hats in these pictures, Phil's plays the unambiguous roles of a token of friendship and an artifact of civilization, but it is a role consistent with the conventions of genre painting. There can be no doubt Ford understood the conventional and symbolic potential of hats, because other hats also have roles to play in the film. On his first patrol, Thursday demonstrates his concern for "military dress and decorum" by ordering the troopers to reshape and crease their hats as fedoras. He himself wears an unusual kepi with a neck cloth, the sort of hat the French Foreign Legion always wears in films. At the end of the film, as several critics have noticed, Captain York puts on a similar hat, which seems to symbolize Thursday's legacy of discipline and decorum. The significance hats will have in the film however, is signaled by the prominent role of Phil's hat in the genre-like setting of Ma Breen's.















